BiliranIsland.com Staff
BiliranIsland.com
First Posted 01:38:00 PM 08/08/2008
Naval, Biliran – the two young witnesses who implicated Gerardo S. Espina, Sr. as co-conspirator in the shooting incident that took place in the evening on June 7, 2008, killing two and wounding one of the bodyguards of Congressman Glenn A. Chong, strongly belied the presence of Atipolo Barangay Captain Ed Gaviola and two others who rode with him in a red XRM motorcycle and naval councilor Victor Del Rosario, Jr. together with his father and driver inside the compound of Espina’s house in Barangay Caray-Caray this town.
Norly Barotol and Marion Merced, aged 18 and 17 respectively of Sitio Ilawod, Barangay Caray-Caray, Naval, Biliran stated in paragraph 8 of their reply affidavit dated august 5, 2008 that Gaviola and del Rosario were not inside the compound of Espina’s house on that evening and that the claim of Gaviola and del Rosario that they were inside the Espina compound on that evening was a great lie, a concoction and a mere allegation.
In the previous affidavits executed by Barangay Captain Ed Gaviola and Councilor Victor Del Rosario, Jr., the two claimed that they went to the house of Gerardo S. Espina, Sr. a few hours later on the night of June 7, 2008.
In the same reply affidavit, the young witnesses confirmed the presence of naval Councilor Roselyn Espina Paras who disembarked from her car infront of the guard house just 1 1/2 meters away from them.
For her part, Councilor Roselyn Espina Paras denied the allegation of the two young witnesses that she was inside the Espina compound on that night by presenting several travel documents to vouch that she was in manila when the shooting incident happened.
They added that there was no Captain Ed Gaviola driving a motorcycle with two companions nor Councilor Victor del Rosario, with his driver and father that came inside until they left the compound at 1:00 A.M.
They claimed they know Captain Ed Gaviola and Councilor Victor Del Rosario, personally.
Barotol and Merced stated that the claim that it was Gaviola who allegedly rode the red XRM motorcycle together with two other companions who are unidentified up to now was made to mislead the prosecution and the court.
AGUY..ANG TAGA BILIRAN ISLAND.COM STAFF GILIHIS ANG ANG PAG REPORT SA REPLY NGA AFFIDAVIT SA 2 K MGA BATA,PASABOT LANG GUD NING MGA TAWHANA NGA PARTISAN KAAYO.MAO DIAY NGA KONTROLADO NILA ANG MO BLOG NGARI KAY MAY GIDAPIGAN DIAY NI NGA WEBSITE.
PILA KAHA ANG MONTHLY NGA SWELDO ANI NGA MGA STAFF,I POST GAD N NINYO ANG DETALYADO NGA AFFIDAVIT ARON KABASA POD MI UNSAY MGA KOMENTO NING MGA BATAA.
Utip,
As a matter of fact i have no respect for liars therefore you dont deserve my time.
Thank you.
really???? you dont have the time for those who are liars?? how about u? try to ask yourself ? i have one thing to ask u? why is it only those blogs who favor Cong. Chong will appear in this blogs… how many times my friends keep on asking why their blogs are not accepted and dont appear in B.I. Now i can conclude that B.I is only for PRO-CHONG….
pag tsur jalms oi
UTIP
BITAW
KLAROHA DHA JAMZ
IF YOU THINK NGA GILIHIS PAGREPORT SA BILIRANISLAND.COM ANG MAONG REPLY AFFIDAVIT, YOU CAN POINT THE DISCREPANCIES ONE BY ONE INSTEAD OF MAKING GENERAL AND SWEEPING CHARGES AGAINST THE ADMINISTRATOR.
MAS MAAYO INYONG IPOINT OUT ANG DISCREPANCIES ARON IT WILL BE SUBJECTED TO FREE DISCUSSION KUNG DIIN ANG INYONG POINT OF VIEW MASAYRAN UG MAKITA USAB NINYO ANG POINT OF VIEW SA UBAN NGA DILI MOUYON SA INYONG VIEW REGARDING THIS ISSUE.
TO MAKE GENERAL AND SWEEPING ALLEGATIONS WITHOUT POINTING OUT THE DETAILS IS RATHER UNFAIR TO THE ADMINISTRATOR.
POINT THEM OUT AND I WILL COME BACK TO REBUT YOU!
TO ALL MY FRIENDS IN CYBERSPACE:
I THANK YOU FOR KEEPING YOUR FAITH AND TRUST IN ME.
I REALIZE THAT FIGHTING FOR ONE’S RIGHTS AND FREEDOM ALWAYS COMES WITH A PRICE. THE PRICE VARIES ACCORDING TO HOW FAR ANY FIGHTER WILL GO FIGHT AND TAKE RISKS. I HAVE ENDANGERED NOT ONLY MY OWN SELF BUT THE LIVES OF INNOCENT MEMBERS OF MY FAMILY AND THOSE OF MY MEN WHOSE FAULT IS ONLY TO SWEAR AND WORK TO PROTECT ME.
I HAVE FACED THE MANY FACES OF THIS CONTINUING BATTLE TO PRESERVE OUR GAINED FREEDOM. I HONESTLY CANNOT FACE ALL OF THEM AT THE SAME TIME. THAT IS WHY I AM VERY GRATEFUL TO EACH AND EVERY ONE OF YOU HERE FOR YOUR PRESENCE IN THE BLOGS, YOUR POSTS, AND FOR YOUR DEFENSE OF ME AND MY FAMILY. I CANNOT REPAY YOU ENOUGH FOR YOUR OWN TIME, EFFORT, AND ALL OTHER SACRIFICES THAT I MAY NEVER KNOW BUT REST ASSURED I WILL KEEP THEM ALWAYS IN MY MIND AND HEART WHILE I CONTINUE TO DISPENSE WITH MY DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES AS YOUR CHOSEN REPRESENTATIVE.
AGAIN, I THANK YOU FOR KEEPING YOUR FAITH IN ME! I WILL NOT LET YOU DOWN!
GOD BLESS US ALL!
KAMI NALANG ANG ANGAYAN NGA MO PAKGANG ANING
MGA PANULTIHON NI UTIP,DILI NI SI UTIP ANGAYAN TUBAYAN DILI MAN NI MAKA KAON UG PAMAHAW KON DILI PINAAGI KAN ESPINA SOHOL.
AKO DINHI ANING BLOG UBOS RA GAYUD ANG AKONG PAGKATAWO ORDINARYO NGA LUMALABAN SA ATONG LIGDONG BOOTAN NGA CONGRESSMAN GLENN CHONG.
SAYOD KAMI NGA ANG IMONG TUMONG MAO ANG KALINAW SA ATONG PINALANGGANG PROBINSYA,NGA MAPAKGANG NA UNTA ANG MGA DAUTAN NGA MGA BINUHATAN.
ARON MABALIK NA UNYA ANG KALAMPOSAN SA TANAN ANG KALINAW SA TANAN MGA KATAWHAN.
thanks truth..
MAO BA UTIP? UG DILI KA MOANGAY NIINING BLOG DIRI NGANO MAN NGA DIA KA RA MAN UG SIGE UG TUSLOK DIRI. NGANONG DILI MAN KA MAG HIMO UG IMONG WEBSITE UG BLOGS PARA DIDTO KA MAG YAWYAW. AYAW DIRI KAY WA KAY NATABANG ANI NGA WEBSITE. DAKO KA KAAYO UG BABA, NGANO MAN NGA SI JALM MAN IMONG BASOLON UG UNSAY IPANG SULAT DIRI SA MGA BLOGGERS? HAWID BA NI JALM ANG MGA UTOK NIANING MGA TAWHANA. AYAW PAG PASAGAD UG YAWYAW KLAROHA USA KA MO YAMBAT.. KAY BISAN UG SINGKO WALA MODAWAT SI JALM SA MGA BLOGGERS, ALTHOUGH MAY MGA SPONSORS KINI NGA WEBSITE. PERO WAY LABOT SA POLITIKA ANG MGA SPONSOR NIANING WEBSITE. TUA RA SA LAING NASOD ANG MGA SPONSOR NIANING WEBSITE, UG WALA SILA MANGHILABOT SA MGA YAWYAW NINYO..KAMO KAMO RA MAN DIRI. DAGHAN MAN KAHA KA UG NASABTAN NGANO NGA DILI MAN KA SA HUSGADO MAG WITNESS, IKAW SIGURO ANG GISWELDUHAN SA IMONG GIDAPIGAN KAY MANG GALAITI MAN GAYOD KA. WA KO KAILA ANANG IMONG GIDAPIGAN PERO AYAW PAG KASAKO UG UNSAY IMONG MABASAHAN DIRI. KON DILI KA GUSTO HALA PAG HIMO UG IMONG WEBSITE, PARA DIDTO KA MAG YAWYAW. OR KAHA KONG MAY KWARTA KA, MAG SPONSOR KA SA RADIO NATIN OR RADIO NINYO PARA MATIGBAW KA SA IMONG GIBATI. MORA MAN KA UG MAY GI SKWELAHAN PERO NAA RA SA INYONG SILINGAN MAMATI UG TABI. RADYO BAKTAS KA MAN GIHAPON. TINGALI MAO RA NA ANG MODERN TECHNOLOGY IMONG NAHAWIRAN NO UTIP.? LOOYA NIMO. HASTA WEBMASTER NGA IMONG NAPAKINABANGAN IMONG AWAYON. KABAGA SA IMONG DAGWAY.. PAG SIMBA UG KRISTYANO KA BA.. PILAY GIHATAG SA IMO NGA SWELDO? PARA IPAGTANGOL GYOD NIMO IMONG MGA AMO?
jalmz,
di ba?gi post naman to ang detalyado nga reply nga affidavit ni merced ug barotol deri… unsay may hinungdan nga gi w-draw man lagi,paki post lang ang detalye ana nga affidavit aron fair ba…ang affidavit sa mga espina naka post man ang tanan nga detalye.So…paki post pod ang kini nga reply nga affidavit sa 2 k mga bata.
Interesting choice of words – the term belie means “to show to be false” (according to dictionary.com). This is much stronger than saying the two boys dispute or disagree with the statements by Espina, et al. It actually says the boys have shown those statements to be false. I understand there might be some issues with English usage, but BI.com should issue an apology for saying the Espina camp statements are false, and change the wording in this article. I can verify that the term belie in common usage means not disagreement but refutation or disproving.
Again, BI.com in its writing takes a position blatantly favoring the Chong camp. It seems these articles from “BI.com staff” are being written by fervid Chong supporters.
anona #11,
yes, absolutely your right my friend but BI.com has to use that word to illustrate the position of the 2 witnesses.the word “BELIE” best describes the unwavering stand of what the witnesses saw. however that doesn’t mean BI.com favord the position of the witnesses, that’s just a literature of the media which has to be taken just as it is out of malice.well if you have malice in your mind then you will take it as what you thought of.
anokava:
You are absolutely wrong my friend. The word means what it means, and you cannot excuse its use by saying they intended something other than what it means. Belie is NOT a stronger form of disagree. There are other words and adjectives like adamant or vehement. BI.com is simply revealing their prejudice. Its ok to have a position. The sin is in pretending you don’t have a position. They did the same thing when they said it took courage for the boys to come forward.
Belie literally means to show to be a lie. So BI.com is saying the boys have shown the position of the Espina people to be a lie. Jalm – give up your pretense of fairness and independence.
anona:
friend remember the issue here is the answer, stand or reaction of the 2 witnesses correlating Gaviola, del rosario and roselyn statements belying the statements of the witnesses. “BELIE” is the appropriate word on this issue coz the 2 witnesses didn’t only answer vehemently or adamantly against Gav.delros.ros. statements but soundly the same indicting them perjury (lying under oath). so that “BELIE” word conveys 2 meaning in understanding the statement of the witnesses, that is; they stand vehemently of the truth and indicting them they lied.
BI.com must use “BELIE” word as the appropriate word to describe the possition of the witnesses. as i’ve said this word is a media literature which has nothing to do with favoring nor leaning to either of the two sides.
Anona,
be one of us anona…GO GO GO GO WE NEED YOU…
Anokava: No amount of rationalization will change what the word means, and I well understand what the issue is. Your interpretation is BS. It reveals that in the opinion of the writer the boys are right and the Espinas are wrong, and thus BI.com is nothing more than a functionary of the Chong camp.
It is not true that the boys have “belied” the presence of Gaviola, del Rosario, et al.
Notice that admin has not jumped in here to defend themselves, which I take as a tacit admission of fault – having substantial implications.
To all biliranon,
Sa akong personal na analysis bahin niining duha ka witness. I think they are telling the truth… and I am so proud of them. You know, young and new politician like Ed Gaviola and Del Rosario they know how and when to lie…otherwise their political carrier is in great danger. but I am sure they are loosing anyway by the next local election. About Roslyn “Boarding Pass” well, experiencewise is very easy to obtain that “Boarding Pass” as long as you buy the ticket and of course the connections inside the airport. Let pray for peace and order to the biliran island….bobong tan
bobong tan
suway daw makasecure ka bah easily.ayaw pag una sa korte kay if naa na kaso mangayo na korte klaro kupya sa PAL uy.paghuwat.uy ayaw ingon na politicians si jdr ug ed mamakak nalang.personally kaila ka nila?ug nakaila ka ana na 2 ka testigo.puro minor age tapos wala trabaho na uy.
insakto ba na sila charlie mao magtago sa ilaha tapos gsuwelduhan pa.bias na kayo .tinudloan pa ne watatoy unsa storya sa affidavit.g angkon man na ne boy ty na mao na abogado sa mga bata.ang subra ka maro na abogado may “K”.hahahaha.
ngano naninguro man sila charlie ngeta mga testigo kay hadlok sila.
aguy uy.kana glenda hingdaug sa hugaw na paagi.pamalit ug boto,gamit ug panumangil na issue.no wonder mao ghapon na ila buhaton para stay sila sa power.
iya pagdangan para sa kaayohan si biliran?hinuon para kabalos sila sa espina ky wala na sila hatage ug projects ug toa sila mao nagpa raid sa ila store ug kay ang gusto glenda magwork sa DFA wala siya natabange ne espina sr.
ug usa pa kana si glenda after pagpasar ana ya kurso.standby raman dha la tindahan.sigi pangasaba sa ya trabahante ,etc..mao main na trabaho. na kay wala may hingkuha nya na magpalaban ug kaso.hahahaha.
almonti
sakspan ta naka.ikaw ne si boy ty noh?pa almonti ka pa.deli ka si bong ug rest sa iya bro uy kay maau to english unya deli to bogok pareha nimo.
ATONG LIGDONG BOOTAN NGA CONGRESSMAN GLENN CHONG.
wala ka kuyapi pang storya ini?hahaha
anona:
yes friend no amount of rationalization would change what the word means specially if the reader insistently standing on one point of understanding.even if BI.com explains what the word means you still won’t take it coz you’re simply fixated.
shalom friend! salamalaykum!!
Ernest Dimnet in his book “The Art of Thinking”, presented how readers should weigh and analyze the message contained in a story (e.g. news or any media literature).One interesting view he shared is that when he considered news as history. Deciphering the message, one can clearly see that the readers have been given the wide range and scope in judging, analyzing and assessing whether the story that one reads is the truth or not.
The idea of Dimnet is best illustrated in the comment or series of comments to one of the avid readers of BI. Com who said that the word belie used in a certain sensational news article is not the appropriate word since it is like judging that the parties involved (Gaviola, Del Rosario Paras) were not telling the truth and that the young witnesses statements were true.
The comment or comments of that particular reader are right because that what she thinks of the story and the rest of the readers who shared the same view with her regarding the article. However, we could not also blame other individuals who read the story and believed in the appropriateness in the use of the word belie chosen by the writer among the array of synonymous words.
Every writer has its own unique style and way of presenting facts into a news article. One good mark of a writer is that he can hold on the attention of his reader and that his article or articles are often or most of the time utilized by the public. .
One way to immediately catch the attention of the readers is to place “weighty” word or words such as using the word belie instead of dispute or disagree. That’s one good technique in writing news.
The writer of the story pick the word belie instead of dispute or disagree because that what he thinks is the appropriate word that will give life on the reply-affidavit executed by the two young witnesses.
A writer cannot go beyond the fact or set of facts in the document unless he belongs to the tribe of “envelopmental journalist” where there start the biases and prejudices on the print news and even in the field of broadcast reporting originated.
If the young witnesses really are telling the truth then the use of the word belie of the writer of the article is right.
Remember that BI.Com has likewise posted the affidavits of both camps including the affidavits of Ed Gaviola, Jun Del Rosario and Roselyn Espina Paras including her various travel documents.
Now that these documents are already presented to the public, one can now discern who is telling the truth or not based on one’s analytical observations and assessment.
The writer is not biased nor leaning on one political camp since what he wrote is just based on the document shown to him which served as basis in his write-up.
The avid readers of BI.Com news articles should remember that the final judge of what you read is no other than YOU!.
Anona,
You are entitiled to your own opinion. The use of the word “belie” does not mean that it was the understanding of this writer to create an impression that the previous statements made were false rather such usage was based on the gist of the reply affidavits of these two young witnesses.
I assure you that this writer remain neutral to all issues brought out in this website.
Jalmz:
This is NOT a matter of my opinion or your intention. Its a matter of definition. You say “it was not the intention to create an impression that the previous statements were false”. But that is exactly what the word means – that something is false, a lie. You may want to say you didn’t call Espinas liars, but that’s what you did.
The word is used where hard evidence makes the conclusion obviously contradictory to something that was claimed. “The rain belied the promise of a sunny day.”
If you are neutral, the only course is to issue an apology for your misunderstanding of what the word means.
Navaleno:
Your writing seems erudite, but the artistic license of a writer does not dismiss a writer’s responsibility to use words properly, especially in highly pejorative context such as this. As I said before, “belie” is NOT am emphatic form of disagree. Your argument would disclaim any responsibility to accuracy for a writer. As I recall, Dimnet was a big fan of rigorous semantics.
You guys can try to rationalize all you want, but you have said nothing to challenge my original statement, nor to defend your irresponsible and prejudicial use of language.
This writer remains steadfast that the choice and the use of the word `belie` does not, in any way, prejudiced anybody`s statement. Its was made in the context of the reply affidavit belying the previous allegations subject of such affidavit. Apology, therefore, is not in order.
Does your writer intend to publish his or her own dictionary of the English language? Obviously doesn’t like the ones that already exist. If you employ a writer who calls Espinas liars, which is what this writer did, then what is your responsibility in the matter? You said the article is by BI.com staff. So please drop all pretense of neutrality for your website. The article is not neutral, fair or independent.
Was the first article which says “it took a lot of courage for the boys to come forward” by the same writer? As I said before, it only took courage if what the boys said was true. Therefore, that article is also saying that the boys are telling the truth. And if the boys are telling the truth, then the Espinas are lying.
How much are you being paid by the Chongs to distort the news.
jalmz,navaleno,et al:
with due respect to anona, guys no amount of brilliant ideas could ever sway anona’s view in respect to his understanding of the terminologies used by the writer.anona is correct in his/her own right.
anona:
got your point,it’s impressive, brilliant but i couldn’t take it as the only and only point to stand in reference to the meaning of the writer’s words used.i don’t discredit your point coz that’s possible though but neither i discredit possible views other than yours.you’re just so intelligent which you think than we are so as to believing doggedly you are right and we are wrong.
friend you don’t own absolute and brilliant ideas.you may have them but others may have too.
Anona: all your posts on this issue
The fact, that posts and new releases of both the Espina family and the Chong family appear on this site is a clear manifestation that it is neutral.
The fact, that comments from both pro Espina and pro Chong bloggers are posted on this site demonstrates the administrator’s impartiality to issues discussed on this blog.
If you think using the word “belie” on this issue favors a certain party, I suggest that you also accuse the writers of the following articles for bias. These are just a few examples; I can give you hundreds more if you want.
But to ask the webmaster to apologize and accuse the writer of being paid?
3 bishops belie rumors CBCP divided over the issue of granting …
30 Oct 2007 … 3 bishops belie rumors CBCP divided over the issue of granting pardon to Erap. The Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) is …
http://www.gov.ph/news/default.asp?i=19197 – 36k – Cached – Similar pages
Boracay – Philippines | Boracay belies rumors of corpses from ship …
Boracay belies rumors of corpses from ship. July 21st, 2008 by news feed … 3:19 pm and is filed under Boracay News, Local Topics, News, Philippine News. …
http://www.boracay.biz/news/general-philippine-news/boracay-belies-rumors-of-corpses-from-ship/ – 16k – Cached – Similar pages
Poverty News Blog: [Philippines] President to focus on addressing …
News and links about the struggle of the poor around the world. … of others clearly belie the administration’s claim that the economy is in good shape. …
povertynewsblog.blogspot.com/2006/02/philippines-president-to-focus-on.html – 18k – Cached – Similar pages
Bulatlat.com
… inquire; to unearth facts. Volume IV, Number 22 July 4 – 10, 2004 Quezon City, Philippines … Budget Cuts Belie Arroyo’s ‘Education-for-All’ Claim …
http://www.bulatlat.com/news/4-22/4-22-budget.html – 26k – Cached – Similar pages
BBC News | Asia-Pacific | Spratly facilities ‘not for military …
China tells the Philippines that buildings it put up on a disputed reef … Big satellite dishes positioned on the buildings appear to further belie the …
news.bbc.co.uk/2/low/asia-pacific/300886.stm – 11k – Cached – Similar pages
Global Voices Online » Philippines
The big news (as far as the region is concerned) during the opening ceremonies are the … A Filipino politician reveals his monthly salary to belie popular …
http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/-/world/east-asia/philippines/ – 102k – Cached – Similar pages
Press Release – Pia: Government’s own indicators belie claim of 23 Jul 2007 … She said the findings of the “2006 Indicators on Philippine Development” released last July 18 … News Latest News Feed. Thursday, August 7 …
http://www.senate.gov.ph/press_release/2007/0723_cayetano1.asp – 13k – Cached – Similar pages
MiningWatch > Political Assassinations Increase Sharply in …
19 Jul 2006 … Political killings in the Philippines have been escalating steadily … with the mining transnational corporations belie all assurances of …
http://www.miningwatch.ca/index.php?/Philippines/Political_Killings_Increase – 23k – Cached – Similar pages
Newsbreak Online – Palace belies FSGO claim of ‘bad governance’
25 Jul 2008 … Palace belies FSGO claim of ‘bad governance’ arrow News arrow … that this year, the Philippines achieved an odd milestone in rice …
newsbreak.com.ph/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=5154&Itemid=88889051 – 48k – Cached – Similar pages
As I told you in your previous posts in another blog, this case is now in the court of proper jurisdiction. Let us leave the matter in their capable hands.
Bye for now.
Halos mga katawhan sa Naval makaduda ug nakahibawo nga namakak lang ning duha ka testigo kunohay nila charlie chong ug glenn .ug sila mismo nakahibawo ana kay gtudloan na nila ang 2 ka batan on unsaon pagstorya.
sa permiro mura deli ta makatou or moabot sa aton ghunahuna na drama lang nila kay 2 jud ka kinabuhi na angin.pero sa ilang gibuhat na naniguro sila pangbayad ug testigo para makakuha lang.naniguro yawyaw depensya sa ila kaugalingon .nagpakita na sila naa gitaguan na dakong secreto.ug sa mga storya bahin sa relasyon sa duha ka biktima sa kang charlie. usa ka semina usa to nahitabo makaingon ta nga sila may rason na mapalikidar pud tong duha.
sa pagkakaron kadtong moingon na sila mao nagstorya sa tinuod.well para ra na sa kadto wala nakahibawo ug nagsusi susi unsa tinuod na panghitabo ug kadtong binayran na.i mean like BOY TY,.,,etc..
anokava:
How many times do I have to say this? Point of view has no effect on the definition of a word. You might think Stop means Go, but your point of view doesn’t make it so. The writer said Espinas are lying, and site admin (Jalmz) defends the statement. There is no uncertainty about what was said.
Aquarius:
1) This site is not neutral, rather they are attempting to maintain a pretense of neutrality and fairness. One has to look just a little deeper to see their clearly exposed prejudice.
I could say their pretense of fairness is belied (i.e. is revealed to be false) by their use of language.
2) Past misuses of a word do not excuse current misuse. (Some of the examples you gave are acceptable usage.) I understand that the writer and site admin may not have understood proper usage of the word “belie”. Now that they know, a statement of error and retraction is in order.
3) What about the article saying it took courage for the boys to come forward and reveal what they saw? Have you no comment about that? It is equally offensive.
4) It is this site that is not willing to leave the matter in the hands of the investigating authorities – by making a blatant attempt to influence and prejudice public opinion.
5) This site and blog is widely seen as a tool of the Chong camp. There is not much from the opposition here because few think it worth reading, that it is not a place for a fair hearing, and not many beside those deeply prejudiced (or profiting from Chong power) pay attention.
Advertisers – you are supporting ONE political party.
anona:
got your point,it’s impressive, brilliant but i couldn’t take it as the only and only point to stand in reference to the meaning of the writer’s words used.i don’t discredit your point coz that’s possible though but neither i discredit possible views other than yours.you’re just so intelligent which you think than we are so as to believing doggedly you are right and we are wrong.
friend you don’t own absolute and brilliant ideas.you may have them but others may have too.
anona:
friend remember the issue here is the answer, stand or reaction of the 2 witnesses correlating Gaviola, del rosario and roselyn statements belying the statements of the witnesses. “BELIE” is the appropriate word on this issue coz the 2 witnesses didn’t only answer vehemently or adamantly against Gav.delros.ros. statements but soundly the same indicting them perjury (lying under oath). so that “BELIE” word conveys 2 meaning in understanding the statement of the witnesses, that is; they stand vehemently of the truth and indicting them they lied.
BI.com must use “BELIE” word as the appropriate word to describe the possition of the witnesses. as i’ve said this word is a media literature which has nothing to do with favoring nor leaning to either of the two sides.
ASA NA SILA norly barotol….marion merced…ernesto gelizon…CONG CHONG alyas idol/freedom fighter…hehehe
KUMUSTA NA ANG 2 K WITNESS NGA GIGAMIT SA INYONG GI idolong kongresista..PAGPANDAY UG scripted affidavit…hehe..CONG.CHONG TUBAGA MI? UNSA GAYOD ANG IMONG paminaw NGA NAKABIKTIMA KA UG TAWO,GAMIT ANG DILI MAKATAWHANONG PAAGI? scripted affidavit NAAKO UG BUHAT? ANG GITAWAG NGA freedom fighter ug gi idolized sa kaubanan..hheh