Lawyer for disbarment

[KillerQueen]

These lawyers should be disbarred.

Felisberto Verano, lawyer of the “Alabang Boys” admitted preparing the release order for his clients and used the stationery of the Department of Justice to do it. He thought he could pull a fast one on Raul Gonzalez.

What Verano did was very unethical and unprofessional. Chief state prosecutor Zunio tried to tone it down and use the term “not normal”. Verano and his cohort in the DOJ, Undersecretary Ricardo Blancaflor, should be disbarred. But before he faces disbarrement proceedings, Blancaflor should first be kicked out of the DOJ.

No matter how strong the denial Verano and the DOJ people who handled the drug case of the Alabang Boys have issued, the public will not believe that big money did not change hands.

Why would Verano risk his professions preparing the release order for his clients using the DOJ letterhead unless he had the blessing of some DOJ people? What he did made him liable for disbarment. The bigger the risk, the bigger the amount involved. That’s simple logic.

State prosecutor John Resado, who dismissed the drug cases against the Alabang Boys, is known in the DOJ as the “Dismissal Prosecutor”.

Resado has dismissed many big-time drug cases. It appears that this lawyer has no scruples at all. He admitted being a student of Verano at the Far Eastern University College of Law. He should have inhibited himself from the drug cases where his former professor is the lawyer. One cannot help but speculate that he too received something.

[m1911a2]

Am wondering what is going on with the DOJ, particularly in the National Prosecution Service? Why is it that the DOJ prosecutors cannot find probable cause on drug-related cases filed by PDEA while they can find probable cause on cases against peasants, militant-labor leaders? Almost if not all drug-related cases filed by PDEA to DOJ were being dismissed by the prosecutors themselves mostly because of technicalities, not because of the merit of the case.

To illustrate my point, I want you people to remember the raid made by PDEA in a shabu laboratory in Naguilian, La Union. Six suspects were caught in that operation. (Suspect pa ba yon eh huling-huli na?) Anyway, the case was filed in the provincial prosecutors’ office of La Union a day after the raid. And you know what happened? The DOJ 3-member prosecution panel found no evidence to warrant the filing of charges against the suspects! Isn’t it amazing?

And just recently, the buy-bust operation against the so-called Alabang-boys. The DOJ prosecutors dismissed the case because of technicalities. OH my GOD! Why would the prosecutors easily dismissed drug-related cases? As prosecutors they’re there to prosecute not to pass judgement! If, to their evaluation the case has to be strengthened, they should coordinate with the PDEA, the PNP or other agency.

Well, to my mind, these state prosecutors and lawyers were so young, so brilliant (brilliant ba talaga?) and yet so corrupt.

[agta]

Druglords and drug pushers are clients of bounty for prosecutors and defense lawyers!

[Jeff]

We are at the same boat. Me too wondered why DOJ easily dimissed the case with very minor technicalities and yet the cause affect the lives of the people. They are simply asking for ID, drivers license of those who captured a drug pusher(s) just lack of identification, they released the suspect? Why can't they call the agency who owned the raider, ask if he's really from PDEA? How about if these so called DOJ prosecutors feel if their sons and daughters, is one of the victims or victimized by these drug pushers? Ang labo!


Am wondering what is going on with the DOJ, particularly in the National Prosecution Service? Why is it that the DOJ prosecutors cannot find probable cause on drug-related cases filed by PDEA while they can find probable cause on cases against peasants, militant-labor leaders? Almost if not all drug-related cases filed by PDEA to DOJ were being dismissed by the prosecutors themselves mostly because of technicalities, not because of the merit of the case.

To illustrate my point, I want you people to remember the raid made by PDEA in a shabu laboratory in Naguilian, La Union. Six suspects were caught in that operation. (Suspect pa ba yon eh huling-huli na?) Anyway, the case was filed in the provincial prosecutors’ office of La Union a day after the raid. And you know what happened? The DOJ 3-member prosecution panel found no evidence to warrant the filing of charges against the suspects! Isn’t it amazing?

And just recently, the buy-bust operation against the so-called Alabang-boys. The DOJ prosecutors dismissed the case because of technicalities. OH my GOD! Why would the prosecutors easily dismissed drug-related cases? As prosecutors they’re there to prosecute not to pass judgement! If, to their evaluation the case has to be strengthened, they should coordinate with the PDEA, the PNP or other agency.

Well, to my mind, these state prosecutors and lawyers were so young, so brilliant (brilliant ba talaga?) and yet so corrupt.

[Jeff]

Druglords and drug pushers are clients of bounty for prosecutors and defense lawyers!

Mas malaki ang kita ba ng defense lawyer kay sa prosecutor?

[m1911a2]

Mas malaki ang kita ba ng defense lawyer kay sa prosecutor?



In these drug-related cases, the defense lawyer and the prosecutor were in the same boat and thus must be disbarred. It is very glaring that both of them received something from the accused.

"... let us kill all the lawyers." Shakespeare said. Shall we?

[agta]

Oh Shakespeare!

It is simply an overkill... For the Almighty is also a lawyer! But not a corrupt lawyer...

[m1911a2]

Oh Shakespeare!

It is simply an overkill... For the Almighty is also a lawyer! But not a corrupt lawyer...


Really? I thought the Almighty is a just Judge. I don't believe He is a lawyer. I believe He is a Judge for "He will judge the living and the dead." Is there a biblical passage that says He lawyered for anybody or anything?